Wyoming’s Crash Program to
Develop ‘Green’ Coal
- Will 2008 be the Last Record-Breaking Year for Coal?
- Coal in the Crosshairs
- Subcommittee to Meet on Wind Energy Tax
- DOE to Fund CO2 Storage Projects
- Development of Clean Coal Technologies Goal of UW’s
Call for Proposals - New Study Casts Doubt on Carbon Sequestration
- Oil and Gas Dispatches
- Wyoming First State to Codify Law for
Carbon Sequestration - Barrasso: Finding Cleaner Ways to Use Coal; Best Way to Cut Greenhouse Gases
- CO2 Reduction Not Part of WyGen III Coal-Fired Plant — at Least for Now
- Will 2008 be the Last Record-Breaking Year for Coal?
- Coal in the Crosshairs
- Subcommittee to Meet on Wind Energy Tax
- DOE to Fund CO2 Storage Projects
- Development of Clean Coal Technologies Goal of UW’s
Call for Proposals - New Study Casts Doubt on Carbon Sequestration
- Oil and Gas Dispatches
- Wyoming First State to Codify Law for
Carbon Sequestration - Barrasso: Finding Cleaner Ways to Use Coal; Best Way to Cut Greenhouse Gases
- CO2 Reduction Not Part of WyGen III Coal-Fired Plant — at Least for Now
By John J. Fialka of ClimateWire
California was in the throes of putting together the nation’s first cap on greenhouse gases, and it appeared that if a Democrat were elected president, there might soon be a federal law, as well. At stake was Wyoming’s biggest industry — coal production. Wyoming lawmakers worried that California would lead the nation to impose a ban on imports of out-of-state electricity if it were produced by coal-fired power plants.
For both states, these are meat-and-potatoes questions. Wyoming is, by far, the nation’s biggest coal producer. California is the second-largest electricity market in the United States. Freudenthal took the issue one step further: Were there any circumstances under which California regulators and utilities would consider power produced by Wyoming coal to be “green” enough to sell for premium prices?
The governor, a Democrat, and Wyoming state Rep. Thomas Lubnau II, a Republican, had both been impressed by the exploits of Anadarko Petroleum Corp., a Texas-based oil exploration company that had rejuvenated a century-old Wyoming oil field by injecting carbon dioxide into the formation. The company was touting its new production as “green oil,” because it had taken millions of tons of man-made carbon dioxide being vented into the atmosphere and successfully injected it underground to produce more oil.
Would California recognize “green coal”? Moreover, if engineers in Wyoming figured out a way to separate and bury most of the CO2 emissions resulting from generating electricity by burning coal, could the electricity fetch the high prices being paid by California utilities for wind and solar energy?
“We never got a clear answer,” explains Freudenthal, a tall former state planning coordinator. But he got the Wyoming Legislature to begin setting up the legal framework needed to
support carbon capture and sequestration.